Live Luxe by Jennifer Lopez 3.4 oz Eau de Parfum for Women
By admin on Dec 24, 2007 in Fragrances & Perfumes
A fragrance that turns up the volume on ultimate luxury. It’s a new way to wear Live…more opulent and more glamorous.
Product Summary :
A fragrance that turns up the volume on ultimate luxury. It’s a new way to wear Live…more opulent and more glamorous.-
Price Range:
28.86 - 38.8 -



I have this perfume and I love it. It smells very fresh.
Pro : very fresh
Con : none
ashley_orhn | Dec 24, 2007 | Reply
first of all, the shape of the bottle symbolises JL's body perfectly well. Second, the smell of the fragance is fine. not too good but it was just ok~~
Pro : cheaper than others
Con : ordinary
chad_burray | Dec 24, 2007 | Reply
This was given to me as a gift and I have loved it every since. I am very picky about frangrences becuase I have senstive allergies, but this one works well and I always get "that smells good, what are we wearing."
Pro : The smell is so light I can wear it to work.
Con : nothing…well not that i have
ashlei.thomas | Dec 24, 2007 | Reply
Love it, smells exotic reminds me of the Caribbean.
Pro : Pretty Bottle and Exotic Smell.
Con : I did not find anything wrong with it even the price is good.
meligonlan | Dec 24, 2007 | Reply
Everything she makes smells like laundry detergent. I've tried them all but to no avail she is NOT a perfumer there is just NO WAY sorry
Pro : price
Con : smell
danicsw | Dec 24, 2007 | Reply
This parfum is terrible. honestly to me it smelled like floral bathroom spray. i have no idea why women wear it. probably bc its JLo. i own a parfum shop and there are many better scents. this one islight, thats what i liked, but at the same time its so light that it wears off quickly. on top of that it, it smells no different from the can of bathroom spray from wal-mart, so u might as well buy that and save urself forty bucks. its a worhtless parfum…ladies i recommend Dolce and Gabbana-Light Blue. its about $20 more but fifty times better.
Pro : none
Con : too many
fidaee_asad | Dec 24, 2007 | Reply